Skip to content
  1. Home
  2. Recovery practices
  3. Acupuncture

Acupuncture

Needling therapy delivered by a practitioner.

Recovery practices

Research records

Historical source snapshot. Not freshly verified, not a recommendation. Study findings, community accounts and app defaults are not interchangeable.

Publication suitability · 2026-10-15: Historical reference only; not a clinical verification. Clinical, regulatory, efficacy, safety and dose claims are not independently established by this review.

Acupuncture

Needling therapy delivered by a practitioner.

Evidence category: Systematic review. This describes the source category, not approval or certainty.

Regulatory statement in source: Not separately recorded; do not infer approval from the evidence category.

An individual patient data meta-analysis pooled results from 39 randomised trials and over 20,000 patients to compare acupuncture against sham or no-acupuncture control for chronic musculoskeletal pain, osteoarthritis, headache, and shoulder pain. Acupuncture outperformed both comparators, with treatment effects persisting a year later.

Benefits reported in the imported source

  • Acupuncture outperformed both sham and no-acupuncture control for musculoskeletal pain, osteoarthritis, headache, and shoulder pain across the pooled patient data.
  • Treatment effects persisted with only a small decline at one year in the pooled analysis.
  • The meta-analysis drew on individual patient data from 39 trials, a stronger design than pooling only summary statistics.

Risks and limits

  • Effect sizes versus sham control were smaller than effect sizes versus no-treatment control, indicating part of the benefit may reflect nonspecific or placebo-related mechanisms.
  • Effect sizes varied by trial and were sensitive to the intensity of the control-arm intervention.
  • The review covered a limited set of pain conditions and cannot be generalized to other complaints.

Source bottom line: An individual patient data meta-analysis of 39 trials found acupuncture more effective than sham or no-acupuncture control for several chronic pain conditions, with effects persisting a year after treatment.

Uncertainty: Reference information only. Not medical advice.

Study protocols — reports, not instructions

20,827 patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain, osteoarthritis, chronic headache, or shoulder pain, pooled across 39 randomised trials

Reported regimen
Acupuncture needling compared against sham acupuncture or against no-acupuncture control across the pooled trials
Duration
Trials published through December 2015, with outcomes measured up to one year after treatment
Reported outcome
Acupuncture reduced pain and improved function relative to both sham and no-acupuncture control across all four pain conditions, with only a small decline in effect size at one year
Source
Acupuncture for Chronic Pain: Update of an Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis
Claim provenance

evidence.json#/catalog:recovery:acupuncture/protocols/0

Community and practice descriptions

Accounts of a practice are not evidence of safety or effectiveness. Words such as “standard”, “safe” or “recommended” describe the source account, not verified consensus or this wiki’s advice. Commercial and self-published citations are retained for traceability, not vendor endorsement or independent clinical corroboration.

Historical research outcome: verified-description · 2026-10-06

An attributed practice description was verified without importing the source's benefit claims, recommendations or assumptions about prevalence.

Pharmacokinetic context

No half-life recorded in this source snapshot. No value has been inferred.

Source references

Snapshot provenance

Source ID: catalog:recovery:acupuncture. Commit: adc7684614f9439b41d91a3312b62e7982c7e20e. Review state: historical-not-reverified. Authored links are retained separately from the canonical evidence links in the public data. App templates/defaults and rejected drafts are archived, not deployed.

Related entries and components

None listed.