Skip to content
  1. Home
  2. Food & fasting
  3. Alternate-day fasting

Alternate-day fasting

Alternating fast days and normal eating days.

Food & fasting

Research records

Historical source snapshot. Not freshly verified, not a recommendation. Study findings, community accounts and app defaults are not interchangeable.

Publication suitability · 2026-10-15: Historical reference only; not a clinical verification. Clinical, regulatory, efficacy, safety and dose claims are not independently established by this review.

Alternate-day fasting

Alternating fast days and normal eating days.

Evidence category: Systematic review. This describes the source category, not approval or certainty.

Regulatory statement in source: Not separately recorded; do not infer approval from the evidence category.

Alternate-day fasting alternates fasting days with normal eating days. A systematic review and meta-analysis of seven randomised controlled trials with 269 adults found lower body weight and BMI, plus lower total cholesterol, LDL, triglycerides, fat mass and blood pressure, compared with controls. Fasting blood sugar and insulin resistance did not differ, and lean mass also fell. A network meta-analysis of 24 trials found intermittent fasting produced weight loss similar to steady calorie restriction.

Benefits reported in the imported source

  • Pooled randomised trials found lower weight, BMI, fat mass, cholesterol and blood pressure

Risks and limits

  • Lean mass fell alongside fat mass
  • Blood sugar and insulin resistance did not improve
  • Across 24 trials the weight loss was no different from steady calorie restriction

Source bottom line: Alternate-day fasting lowered weight and lipids in pooled trials, matched plain calorie restriction, and also cut lean mass.

Uncertainty: Reference information only. Not medical advice.

Study protocols — reports, not instructions

269 adults across seven randomised controlled trials

Reported regimen
4:3 alternate-day fasting: 25% of energy needs on fasting days, unrestricted eating on the alternating feeding days
Duration
Trials ran 4 to 48 weeks
Reported outcome
Weight, BMI, fat mass, lean mass, total and LDL cholesterol, triglycerides and blood pressure fell; HDL, fasting glucose and insulin resistance did not.
Source
Health Effects of Alternate-Day Fasting in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (availability check 2026-10-15: possible access barrier; not independently inspected; HTTP 200)
Claim provenance

evidence.json#/catalog:food-protocol:adf/protocols/0

1,768 people across 24 randomised controlled trials in the general population

Reported regimen
Alternate-day fasting, the 5:2 diet and time-restricted eating, compared with continuous calorie restriction
Duration
Not stated
Reported outcome
Intermittent fasting gave weight loss no different from continuous calorie restriction (mean difference 0.26 kg, 95% CI -0.31 to 0.84).
Source
A meta-analysis comparing the effectiveness of alternate day fasting, the 5:2 diet, and time-restricted eating for weight loss (Elortegui et al. 2023)
Claim provenance

evidence.json#/catalog:food-protocol:adf/protocols/1

Community and practice descriptions

Accounts of a practice are not evidence of safety or effectiveness. Words such as “standard”, “safe” or “recommended” describe the source account, not verified consensus or this wiki’s advice. Commercial and self-published citations are retained for traceability, not vendor endorsement or independent clinical corroboration.

Historical research outcome: verified-description · 2026-10-06

Rechecked the previously published description against live source content. The live guide lists alternate-day fasting and describes fasting every other day; no efficacy or adherence claim is repeated.

Pharmacokinetic context

No half-life recorded in this source snapshot. No value has been inferred.

Source references

Snapshot provenance

Source ID: catalog:food-protocol:adf. Commit: adc7684614f9439b41d91a3312b62e7982c7e20e. Review state: historical-not-reverified. Authored links are retained separately from the canonical evidence links in the public data. App templates/defaults and rejected drafts are archived, not deployed.

Related entries and components

None listed.